Quantcast
top of page

Supreme Court Refuses to Review Michigan Voter Roll Maintenance Case

  • Writer: Better American Media
    Better American Media
  • 2 days ago
  • 2 min read
supreme_court_refuses_to_review_michigan_voter_roll_maintenance_case_


Supreme Court Opts Out of Reviewing Michigan Voter Roll Maintenance Case

The Supreme Court has decided not to take on a case regarding the management of voter registration lists in Michigan, specifically focusing on the process of removing deceased individuals. This development upholds lower court decisions that dismissed a lawsuit from the Public Interest Legal Foundation.


The lawsuit, which began in 2021, claimed that Michigan failed to comply with the National Voter Registration Act, alleging that approximately 26,000 deceased individuals remained on the voter rolls. The foundation argued that this situation jeopardized the integrity of the electoral process.


Representing a broader movement of legal challenges surrounding electoral integrity in various states, the Public Interest Legal Foundation criticized Michigan's efforts to maintain its voter rolls. They asserted that the state was not taking adequate measures to remove ineligible voters, contrary to the stipulations of the National Voter Registration Act.


In response, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson defended the state’s voter roll maintenance practices, indicating that the allegations were politically motivated attempts to undermine trust in Michigan's election security. Both the federal district court and the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals supported the state, affirming that Michigan’s procedures are in accordance with legal standards.


The judiciary noted that there are various factors leading to the inclusion of ineligible individuals on voter lists. However, they also recognized that actual instances of voter fraud are extremely rare. The 6th Circuit Court specifically remarked that Michigan's practices not only meet basic legal requirements but also exceed them in certain respects, stating, “Michigan not only undertakes the kind of effort described … but it also adopts additional standards as well.”


 
 
bottom of page